How Darwin’s Theory can grow your business

The Father of Evolutionary Theory, Charles Darwin, celebrates his 200th birthday this year. 2009 is also the 150th anniversary of the publication of his seminal work ‘On the Origin of Species.’ Museums around the world have celebrated with exhibitions, including Australia’s National Museum in Canberra.

Their broad exploration of Darwin – the man, his life and his theories – is on display until March 22 (hurry or you’ll miss it) and I had the pleasure of visiting yesterday. Informative, inspiring and entertaining, I learnt a great deal more about many things. Which led me to think that applying his learnings could benefit us in business.

Natural Selection, explains how species have evolved over time. Why some creatures are now extinct and others are changing right before our eyes. One thing is clear; whether over millenia or hours, organisms must continually adapt to their changing environment in order to survive.

The same can be said of business. A company that created longer-lasting wax candles in 1850 would have had a thriving operation. Until Thomas Edison invented the light-bulb. Then, unless their ‘mission’ was to ‘supply the best light’ and they evolved very quickly to replace their candles with electric light bulbs, that company would have become a dusty side-show, only appropriate for romantic moments. 

In today’s rapidly changing business environment, it is worthwhile thinking about how your company may need to change and grow in order to survive. Though currently focused on today’s financial turmoil, a return to bouyant times will once again require a change from current survival strategies.

So dust off your crystal ball and let’s look at some trends growing in importance. How might they affect your business? How could you apply Evolutionary Theory to forecast prospective growth strategies for your company?

Using a scientific acronym used to describe Evolutionary Theory’s key concepts (VISTA), here is a series of questions that may help create some clarity and insights for your business. 

V – Variation

Variation describes differences in offspring and subsequent generations. It may be the result of inherited genetic variation (such as eye colour) or may be the result of external, environmental causes. “Darwin’s Finches” are a clear example of how environmental impact created variations in the Galapagos Islands’
bird-life. Though from the same ancestor, by the time Darwin discovered the Galapagos finches, each island’s population had significant beak variations, according to the diet and feeding habits available at each location.

How could Variation apply to your Business?

  1. What monitoring systems do you have in place to determine which of your practices and products are the most/least popular?
  2. Are you being notified early enough, of changes in their ranking?
  3. Are you forecasting future trends?
  4. What variations will you require in order to meet upcoming demand and minimise losses from outdated models?

I – Inheritance

Inheritance describes the basic building blocks (or genes) passed from parent to offspring. For example: hair colour, eye colour and height. Some inherited genes may never come to fruition. Over time, external factors conspire to enable or subdue many potential characteristics. For instance, though someone may have the ‘tall’ gene, a poor diet and ill-health may mean that they never exceed the average height. In other words, inheritance describes what may happen but not always what does happen.

How could Inheritance apply to your Business?

  1. What characteristics has your business simply inherited from industry norms/practice?
  2. Do what degree does your parent company or its Directors impose their viewpoint on company practice? 
  3. Does this influence positively or negatively affect your performance?
  4. Are these inherited (often subconscious) practices open to change?

S – Selection

An environment will favour certain characteristics over others. For example, Darwin’s finches’ beaks range from the stout beaks of seed-eaters, to the curved beaks of flower-eaters to the delicate, slender beaks of insect-eaters. Over time, nature favours characteristics which deliver the strongest survival prospects, ensuring that it becomes dominant, then entrenched.

How could Selection apply to your Business?

  1. When looking at the inherited characteristics above, what changes could you apply to effect a variation (point-of-difference) from others in your category?
  2. What external forces (such as the economic climate) are changing the face of your business?
  3. How can you respond/change favourably, so that you adapt to survive such effects? Note that in Darwin’s Theory, these are simply minor, incremental shifts rather than one massive upheaval.

T – Time

Time is a critical factor in Natural Selection and characteristics’ dominance. One generation does not entrench a mutation but its consistent survival and occurrence may eventually result in its dominance. Evolutionary periods vary greatly in their rate of expansion and development, which indicates that certain circumstances produce an explosion in growth potential and other circumstances inhibit rapid change.

How does Time apply to your Business?

  1. Have you ever taken time to analyse your current business and industry in the context of history? It may seem like this is a tough economic period, but there have been others. 
  2. What strategies did your industry and other business’ apply during similar, past circumstances, that ensured their survival?
  3. What are your businesses 3 month, 6 month, one year, five year and ten year Plans? How does time affect your goals and ambitions?
  4. What minor changes could you implement today, that may build to have a cumulative and lasting impact over a ten year period?

A – Adaptation

Adaptation is the gradual formation, through evolution, of a number of different species from a common ancestor, each adapted to a different niche. A species is defined once a population is divided and each sub-group taking a different evolutionary route until they have diverged so much that interbreeding is no longer possible.

How does Adaptation apply to your business?

  1. What is your company’s core focus?
  2. Are each of its departments complementary and working towards this one goal, OR, are they diverging along separate paths and towards different end goals?
  3. Is this creating efficiencies or losses? Now? In five years?
  4. At what point should you move these divisional lines into clearly separate businesses in order to ensure future, long-term survival?

Today’s Snapshot

What have you learned about your business today? Is it well-positioned to take advantage of future change or it will it find its resting place alongside the dinosaurs? 

Has this discussion sparked any further questions that may help ensure your business’s survival? Please share them with us.

Let’s get this conversation started,
Charlotte

Share

Tank Hunting in Kavieng

Well I’ve been busy since my last post, catching up with long-lost friends on Facebook. One of them is our own modern Hemingway, Jason Kovacs. Following from my last conversation on work/life balance, Jason is managing to combine his love for adventure and natural storytelling by volunteering in the Peace and now Reserve Army Corps. 

Here is his delightfully entertaining and educational home-doco on Tank Hunting in Kavieng… (read: For Whom the Bell Tolls 2008). Now that’s what I call an interesting holiday adventure. And probably the most enjoyable doco I’ve watched in a while. If you’re a history buff or like some I know, have an interest in PNG, then this one’s especially for you.

So, can YOU better Jason’s storyWhat’s the most fun or interesting fact you have learned while travelling?

Mine? That while prawn poisoning and appendicitis feel excruciatingly similar, you don’t want to be operated on in Fiji.

Let’s get this conversation started. And thanks to Jase for sharing :)

Share

Art or Exploitation?

When does artistic freedom become exploitation? A discussion of modern media and the Bill Henson debacle.

Yesterday’s post on Hrant Dink provoked an interesting comment from Tim, likening Turkey’s Article 301 to the suppression of Australian photographer, Bill Henson. I began responding with a simple comment but my thoughts on this are too long for the short reply, so here is another post.Art

For those living internationally, a Bill Henson exhibition was shut down earlier this year, following claims of child exploitation. Some photographs featured a naked thirteen-year old girl. For those wanting details, this Wikepedia entry nicely summarises the media chain reaction. Here I thought we could explore Tim’s suggestion that suppressing Henson’s art is similar to suppressing freedom of speech around the world.

art or porn?On the surface of it, I have to agree. But then again, Henson’s subject matter is quite different from Dink’s. Without having seen all the photos of the 2008 exhibition, I find the Henson debacle a tough one. Yes I support freedom of expression and the exploration of life through art. But is it really necessary to photograph naked 13 year olds?

Henson has said in an earlier interview with egothemag.com,

“The reason I like working with teenagers is because they represent a kind of breach between the dimensions that people cross through. The classical root of the word “adolescence” means to grow towards something. I am fascinated with that interval, that sort of highly ambiguous and uncertain period where you have an exponential growth of experience and knowledge, but also a kind of tenuous grasp on the certainties of adult life.”

Yes, travelling through and surviving adolescence is tricky. As teenagers we often have a very tenuous grasp on what is safe especially when exploring our sexuality. Doing so within the security of friends, family and those with our best interests as heart is exciting. But should complete strangers ogle this journey? If my naked thirteen-year old daughter was the subject of exploration by men well past their prime, I would be disgusted. That is exactly what happens when such images are presented as ‘art’ and hung in public galleries.

For argument’s sake – let’s broaden our view and look at where else such imagery is displayed. What is the difference between Bill Henson’s exhibition and the upcoming film, ‘Twilight’ – a love story between a teenage mortal and a teenage vampire. The two-minute trailer I watched recently was as dark, brooding and sexually charged as any Henson photo I have seen. I saw it before enjoying Sex and the City, a film I was going to see with my fourteen-year old niece until her Mum thought twice about its content. Interestingly, my niece and her Mum both love the book, Twilight, and I imagine they will see the movie as soon as it comes out.

So where do we draw the line? At what point does artistic exploration become perversion? 

Perhaps Henson has done us a favour? By using a different medium has Henson simply made us view the sexualisation of minors with fresh eyes? Or is it that society is becoming more conscious of the issue? Comparing Henson’s 2008 photographs with those of his 2003 exhibition, one would argue that these recent shots are far less shocking than his earlier work. They attracted far less scrutiny. If you’d like to make your own comparisons, visit the Ros Oxley online gallery.

Because we are bombarded daily with these images in film and teen magazines have we become blind? By using a new channel has Henson simply reduced the static and inflamed a healthy debate? 

I’d love to hear your thoughts. Please add your comments.

Let’s get this conversation started,
Charlotte

 

Share

Words that kill

Last post I asked whether you saw words as playthings or tools. If written well, I believe they can be both. Poetry and meaning. Lyricism and results. Something that activates, excites and changes behaviour. In some countries, words can still get you thrown in jail; even executed.

Hrant Dink shot deadWhen prominent Turkish journalist, Hrant Dink, was assassinated in January last year he was about to go to trial for the sixth time on charges of speaking against his country. Dink was not afraid of making the bold statement that the Turks committed genocide against neighbouring Armenians during 1915 – 1917. His was not a new statement. Armenia has a Genocide Museum… they believe him.

But many of his nationalistic countrymen don’t. Whilst the Turkish government denounced the assassination, it was their endorsed public prosecutor who pursued Dink on charges under Article 301, which allows the punishment of a person who “insults Turkishness.”

The prosecutor’s relentless attacks on Dink surely contributed to his early demise. I find it particularly absurd and bizarre that, after his death, the Turkish government continued to pursue Dink’s family in court, over his words.

Hrant Dink was killed on January 17, 2007. His son Arat was sentenced to a one year suspended prison term on 11 October 2007. This pursuit to the death and beyond the grave, is suppressing any opposing voice in Turkey. It is denying basic human rights to free speech and suppressing any fostering of alternative opinions.

Advocating the removal of Article 301 altogether is a big ask. It is hotly debated locally and internationally. Those pushing to keep it argue that there are at least five other European countries, which have and use a similar law in order to maintain national pride and support local culture: France, Portugal, Germany, Italy, Austria have all been referenced.

However, many of those work within countries less extreme than Turkey. As with anything, Article 301 becomes about interpretation. When that interpretation denies the fundamental principles of humanity: the right to be an individual, to support freedom of expression and to cherish life, then we need stand against it.

ABC’s Foreign Correspondant recently interviewed Asli Erdogan, a leading novelist and friend of Hrant Dink. When asked if she thought writers could afford to stay silent she replied, “I think on the contrary that we have never had that luxury to be silent… these kind of threats are just the number one reason that the writers should speak up.” Whilst looking down the barrel, her final statement inspired me, “Who is going to defend freedom of talk more than the writers and journalists. It is our job.”

When I read their stories I realise my words and actions pale into insignificance when compared with the hardships Dink and his colleagues endure. I love to write and do so from the safety of Australian shores, behind the protection of my laptop. I write on vagaries and for companies selling their wares. My job won’t kill me but for some like Dink, writing for a living becomes writing to the death.

If you would like to protest against such inhumanities, please follow these prompts to call for action against Article 301. This movement is led by International PEN – a fellowship of writers is working together to promote literature and defend the freedom to write. On their website you will find hundreds of stories, many less publicised than Dink’s crimes against freedom in countries as diverse as China, Thailand, Peru and Zimbabwe. Fellow Aussies can join my local, Sydney PEN or any of five Australian PEN centres listed here.  

Have you read or heard anything recently that has inspired you to act beyond the commercial interests of your everyday? Let us know, by posting your comment on this blog. Please forward this post to anyone who may be interested.

 

Let’s get this conversation started,
Charlotte

 

Share

Hey! I’m talking to you.

Today is my first time. Yes, I’m nervous – I am about to expose myself to the world.

I’ve edited others’, headlined emags, written online articles and scores of whole websites. But in all the years I’ve been preaching the virtues of the web I’ve never written my own blog.

Early this year, when I passed Decypher’s 5th year milestone, I knew it was time. As a business I am a public commodity and as a copywriter, people expect to see my words and thoughts online. My clients, prospects and readers want to know who I am, what I believe and make decisions about whether they’ll engage me, based on that understanding. They expect it. This is how we live today.

So here I am, taking a big, deep breath on the verge of moving my thoughts to the digital realm. Welcome to my first blog post.

What am I so nervous about? … As a copywriter I wax lyrical on others’ behalves but rarely espouse my own views. With a blog I am exposing myself to the world. Though quite a private person, my ponderings will be public. My musings will be up all night, conversing to strangers in places I’ll never see. This blog will make me available to scrutiny even while I sleep, blissfully unaware.

I like anonymity but believe in transparency. Though the internet is a great place to try on a variety of guises and I’ve suggested that many clients use avatars to parade around in another’s lifestyle, that’s just not my thing. When presenting myself, I like to be genuine.

So here I am! To ease the transition I will in all likelihood borrow from other’s ramblings and ask for writers’ contributions. I’m not promising regular and vociferous mandates, merely the odd post here and there, as thoughts beg to come alive and ask for interaction.

Yes, that is why I’m really here. For interaction. I want your input, feedback, thoughts and criticisms. The great thing about a blog (I hope), is that it charges a response from you. I talk to listen.

Whether you’re a first timer or seasoned babbler, please jump into this word space with me. Being my first time, I’d love to hear your stories. What was your very first online post about and what prompted you to actually publish it? Have you written many since? What are the greatest and worst things about sharing your inner musings on a public domain?

Also I’m interested in whether you as a client, read and/or subscribe to any of your suppliers’ or customers’ blogs? Or do you believe blogs should remain decidedly in the personal domain?

OK since its my first time, please help me … make a comment. Its easy. If you haven’t done it before, all you need to do is click on ‘# comments’ near the article headline, then enter your comment in the box provided (beneath everyone else’s). Easy! 5 seconds, that’s all it takes, so come on. Yes, even you Pete. Tell me what you really think.

Also, if you know anyone who loves words, then please link them into to my blog. Let’s get this conversation started!

Until next time,
Charlotte
 

Share